Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A study on the difference of craniofacial morphology between oral and nasal breathing children / 中华口腔医学杂志
Chinese Journal of Stomatology ; (12): 385-387, 2002.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-347367
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>The purpose of this study was to compare the difference of craniofacial morphology between oral and nasal breathing children, and discover the relationship between respiratory mode and craniofacial morphology.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Using the system for the simultaneous measurement of oral and nasal respiration, 34 oral breathing children and 34 nasal breathing children aged from 11 to 14 years were selected.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Compared with the nasal-breathing children, the oral-breathing children showed apparently vertical growth pattern. The mandibuler plane Angle of oral breathing children is 39.3, which is significant greater than that of nasal breathing children (P < 0.01). The jans, the oral-breathing children had shorter mandibular body, larger gonion angle, retrusive chin and face (P < 0.05). On the other hand, in the sagittal direction, the oral breathing children may display all kinds of skeletal facial types. There is no significant difference between the two groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Oral breathing is one of the factors related to the vertical over-development.</p>
Subject(s)
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Respiration / Respiratory Function Tests / Skull / Diagnostic Imaging / Radiography / Nose / Statistics as Topic / Craniofacial Abnormalities / Facial Bones / Mandible Type of study: Diagnostic study Limits: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Chinese Journal of Stomatology Year: 2002 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Respiration / Respiratory Function Tests / Skull / Diagnostic Imaging / Radiography / Nose / Statistics as Topic / Craniofacial Abnormalities / Facial Bones / Mandible Type of study: Diagnostic study Limits: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: Chinese Journal of Stomatology Year: 2002 Type: Article