Effects of Acupuncture Stimulation of Combination of Meridian Points on the Exteroceptive Vibration-Induced Finger Flexion Reflex / 全日本鍼灸学会雑誌

ABSTRACT

It is said that the key to effective acupuncture is to perform appropriate stimulation of the best combinations of meridian points which directly or indirectly affect the disease.<br>In order to determine the difference in the efficacy between combinations of clinically important meridian points, this study examined the effect of two-point acupuncture stimulation on the exteroceptive vibration-induced finger flexion reflex (Eklund et al., 1978).<br>METHOD<br>Subjects were six healthy adults of both sexes between 20 and 35 years of age. Two-point combinations were made of IC₄ Hegu (standard point) with each of the following points IC₆ Pianli, P₇ Lieque, C₃ Shaohai, TM₂₀ Baihui, VU₁₃ Feishu, VU₂₅ Dachangshu, G₃₆ Zusanli. Perception threshold electrical stimulation of each combination was performed at 45Hz for 5min. using subcutaneous needles. The finger flexion reflex was induced by a tapping vibrator applied to the palm and recorded through a pressure transducer.<br>RESULTS<br>1) The combination of adjacent points on the hand Stimulation of Hegu together with Pianli, both of which are on the Large Intestine meridian, caused a strong inhibition of the reflex. The inhibition lasted about twice as long as that caused by stimulation of Hegu alone. However, neither Hegu and Lieque not Hegu and Shaohai stimulation caused prolongation of the inhibition.<br>2) The combination of the hand and the back Neither Hegu and Feishu nor Hegu and Dachangshu stimulation caused any prolongation of the inhibition.<br>3) The combination of the hand and the leg Hegu and Zusanli stimulation caused marked inhibition, which lasted about four times as long as that caused by Hegu-alone stimulation.<br>4) The combination of the hand and the head Hegu and Baihui stimulation caused no or much less inhibition that caused by Hegu-alone stimulation.<br>5) Examination of difference among stimulating methods: Electrical stimulation through surface electrodes (A), Retained subcutaneous needles (B), Electrical stimulation between a subcutaneous needle and the indifferent electrode. (C), Electrical stimulation between subcutaneous needles (D). The intensity of the inhibition effect of these methods can be expressed as follows<br>D>C>B>A<br>DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION<br>The reflex inhibition caused by the standard point stimulation was strengthened or weakened by simultaneous stimulation of an additional point. Based on our examination of the characteristics of the inhibition, it was thought that not only mutual interference of impulses at the spinal level but also humoral factors and some polysynaptic reflex mechanism in the higher center level participate in this effect.