Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and adverse events of sevoflurane versus propofol combined anesthesia for induction of general anesthesia: a Meta-analysis / 中华麻醉学杂志
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology ; (12): 913-915, 2010.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-386092
ABSTRACT
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and adverse events of sevoflurane or propofol combined anesthesia for induction of general anesthesia. Methods We searched the PubMed, OVID, EMBASE,Cochrane Library and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) for studies on efficacy of sevoflurane versus propofol for anesthesia induction. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the method recommended by Cochrane Collaboration. Meta-analysis was conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 4.2.8 software. Results Thirteen prospective randomized controlled trials involving 968 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The results showed that the time from onset of induction to loss of consciousness and the time for induction were significantly longer, the incidence of respiratory depression lower in S group than in P group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events during induction and success rate of inserting LMA at first attempt between the 2 groups. The incidence of adverse events with LMA insertion was significantly lower in S group than in P group. Conclusion Propofol combined anesthesia is suitable for rapid induction of anesthesia, and sevoflurane combined anesthesia is indicated for slow induction of anesthesia in patients with potential respiratory difficulty and for LMA insertion.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Systematic reviews Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology Year: 2010 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Systematic reviews Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology Year: 2010 Type: Article