Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
NBI system versus conventional endoscopy in diagnosis of colorectal adenomas: a systematic review / 中华全科医师杂志
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners ; (6): 710-713, 2009.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-392837
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the validity of narrow-band imaging (NBI) system in detection of colorectal adenoma, as compared to that of endoscopy of the colon and rectum, in a systematic review. Methods Relevant literatures were retrieved from Medline (January 1966 to October 2008), OVID (January 1996 to October 2008), EMBASE (January 1980 to October 2008), Coehrane Library (Issue 3, 2008) and Chinese Biological Medicine Disk (CBM disk, January 1997 to October 2008). Quality of the literatures retrieved was assessed based on the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook and Jadad's score. RevMan version 4. 2 software was used for meta-analysis. Results Seven randomized clinical trials (2838 patients) were included in the study. Compared with white-light colonoscopy, no significant difference was observed in terms of adenoma detection rate (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.00-1.39, P=0.06) by NBI system, which could significantly improve total number of detection for fiat lesions of the colon and rectum (pooled WMD 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.26, P=0.02), but with a longer withdrawn time (pooled WMD 1.05, 95% CI 0.08-1.22, P<0.01). Conclusions Detection rate for flat lesions of the colon and rectum, not for adenoma, can be improved by NBI system and meanwhile its withdrawn time is prolonged, indicating that routine use of NBI system for detecting colorectal adenomas may be recommended only with its further refined technique.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Diagnostic study / Systematic reviews Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of General Practitioners Year: 2009 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial / Diagnostic study / Systematic reviews Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of General Practitioners Year: 2009 Type: Article