Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MR perfusion imaging study of the hepatic hemodynamics in pigs / 中华放射学杂志
Chinese Journal of Radiology ; (12): 1080-1083, 2008.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-398402
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the MR perfusion imaging in measuring the hemodynamics of liver.MethodsCT and MR perfusion imaging were performed in livers of 13 pigs.The hepatic artery perfusion(HAP),portal vein perfusion(PVP),total hepatic blood flow(THBF),portal vein perfusion index(PVI),distribution volume(DV)and mean transit time(MTT)were calculated and compared respectively.Hemodynamics of the liver from two kinds of imaging was compared by paked t-test,and the relativity was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis.ResultsIn CT and MR perfusion imaging of the 13 pigsthe hepatic artery perfusion(HAP)were(37.7±7.38)and(35.80±7.31)ml-min-1·100ml-1.the portal vein perfusion(PVP)were(123.16 35.89)and(121.40±36.81)ml·min-1·100 ml-1.the total hepatic blood flow(THBF)were(160.88±37.05)and(157.21±38.71)ml·min-1·100 ml-1.the portal vein perfusion index(PVI)were(75.95±5.21)%and(76.63±5.24)%,the distilbution volume(DV)were(35.10±11.17)%and(41.03±10.06)%。The mean transit time(MTT)were(14.08±1.40)and(14.94±1.32)s.There were no statistical differences for HAP,PVP,THBF and PVI between CT and MR perfusion imaging(t=1.263,0.926,1.225,-1.115,P>0.05).There were no statistical differences for DV and MTT(t=-3.345,-3.200,P<0.01).Analysis of these two kinds of imaging showed the correlation coefficient of PVP,THBF and PVI were hishly related(r>0.85,P<0.01).Correlation coefficient of HAP,DV and M1T were moderately related(r>0.70,P<0.01).ConclusionsMR perfusion Call quantify the blood flow parameters of liver accurately.It is close to that of the CT perfusion imaging.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Radiology Year: 2008 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Radiology Year: 2008 Type: Article