Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multicenter clinical trial of cefetamet pivoxil vs cefixime in treatment of acute bacterial infections / 中国新药与临床杂志
Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies ; (12): 87-90, 2001.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-411490
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cefetamet pivoxil vs cefixime in the treatment of acute bacterial infections.  

METHODS:

A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted. Ninety-eight patients (M 43, F 55; age 40 a± s 13 a) with acute bacterial infections of cefetamet group were given cefetamet pivoxil 250-500 mg, po, bid, for 7-14 d, and ninty-five patients (M 44, F 51; age 42 a±14 a) of cefixime group were given cefixime 200 mg, po, bid, for 7-14 d. 

RESULTS:

The overall clinical efficacy rates were 95 % and 94 %, the bacterial clearance rates were 96 % and 94 %, the bacterial sensitive rates were 98 % and 96 %, the adverse reaction rates were 7 % and 6 %, respectively. There was no statistical significance between two groups (P>0.05). 

CONCLUSION:

Cefetamet pivoxil and cefixime are effective and safe in the treatment of acute bacterial infections.
Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies Year: 2001 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies Year: 2001 Type: Article