Intracoronary Doppler Flow Reserve Versus Dipyridamole Emission Computed Tomographic 201T1 or 99mTc-Sestamibi Myocardial Imaging / 复旦学报（医学版）

ABSTRACT

PurposeTo compare measures of coronary flow reserve by an intracoronary Doppler guide wire with results of dipyridamole emission computed tomographic 201T1/ 99m Tc-sestamibi myocardial imaging(SPECT).MethodsThe coronary blood flow velocity were measured by Cardiometrics Flomap Ⅱ and 0. 014 or 0. 018 inches Doppler flowire in 27 patients (55 arteries) with coronary angiography. 8 patients (19 arteries )without underlying diseases of coronary microvascular lesions were studied as the normal control. The proximal and distal average peak velocity (APV), diastolic/systolic velocity ratio (DSVR), CFR and proximal/distal velocity ratio (P/DVR) were measured. The results were compared with that of SPECT before angiography. ResultsAccording to the CFR measured by Doppler fiowire, the arteries were divided into two groupsGroup A, consisted of 33 arteries with CFR > 2.0. Group B consistedof 22 arteries with CFR≤2.0. CFR of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (P< 10 - 7). Among 22 arteries with abnormal CFR, SPECT could detect 16. Among 33 arteries with normal CFR, all arteries except 2 showed normal SPECT. With intracoronary Doppler flowire as reference, the sensitivity and specificity of dipyridamole SPECT were 72.73 % and 93.94 %. With results of dipyridamole SPECT as reference, the sensitivity and specificity of intracoronary Doppler CFR were 88.89% and 83.78%. Their conformability rate was 85.45%.Conclusions In evaluating coronary reserve function, results of dipyridamole SPECT was rather conformable to measures of intracoronary Doppler CFR, but they cannot be replaced each other.