Value of critical care medicine scoring systems and procalcitonin in evaluation of severe multiple trauma / 中华创伤杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the value of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ ),sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and procalcitonin (PCT) in assessment of severe multiple trauma. Methods A retrospective study was carried out on clinical data of patients with severe multiple trauma who were admitted to ICU from July 1 st 2010 to October 31 st 2011.PCT detection,APECHE Ⅱ and SOFA scoring were routinely performed for all the patients within 24 hours,and were performed again one week later for the patients who were complicated with sepsis within one week.Results The score of APACHE Ⅱ and SOFA in septic shock group was higher than that in severe septic and septic groups (P ＜0.01 ),while PCT level among septic,severe septic and septic shock groups had no statistical difference (P ＞ 0.05).To determine the predicting accuracy of APECHE Ⅱ score,SOFA score and PCT,receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was constructed.The areas under the curve (AUC) for APECHE Ⅱ score,SOFA score and PCT in predicting the emergence of sepsis on admission was 0.615,0.663 and 0.160 respectively.AUC for APECHE Ⅱ score,SOFA score and PCT in predicting the occurrence of death among the severe multiple trauma patients on admission was 0.576,0.571 and 0.619 respectively.AUC for APECHE Ⅱ,SOFA and PCT in predicting the death of patients complicated with sepsis at one week after admission was 0.746,0.837 and 0.600 respectively. Conclusions Among the APACHE Ⅱ score,SOFA score and PCT,APACHE Ⅱ and SOFA score are better than PCT in assessing the infection severity of sepsis.SOFA score is the best in predicting the occurrence of sepsis,while PCT is the worst.PCT is the best in predicting the occurrence of death of severe multiple trauma patients,while SOFA score is the worst.SOFA score is better than APACHE Ⅱ score and PCT in predicting the occurrence of death of the patients complicated with sepsis.