Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influencing factors of standardization in the hierarchical chain management of type 2 diabetes / 中国综合临床
Clinical Medicine of China ; (12): 1264-1268, 2012.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-420598
ABSTRACT
Objective To analysis the influence factors of standardization in the hierarchical chain management of type 2 diabetes and to enhance the hierarchical chain management of type 2 diabetes.Methods ( 1 ) Six hundred and ninty patients with type 2 diabetes completed 1 years management were divided into well-controlled glycosylated hemoglobin ( HbAlc ) group (<7.0% ) and bad-controlled glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc) group ( ≥ 7.0% ).The conditions of diet,physical activity,medication,self-blood sugar monitoring and participation in health seminars were investigated and analyzed.(2) The patients were divided into standardized management group and not standardized management group.Their age,sex,educational background,occupation,monthly income per person,medical security,the course,cognition for glycuresis,two-way transfer,and chronic complications were investigated and statistically analyzed.Results ( 1 ) The proportions of physical activity (70.1% vs 54.2%,x2=6.163,P=0.018),self-blood sugar monitoring(60.4% vs 43.8%,x2=6.268,P=0.016) and participation in health seminars (56.0% vs 41.7%,x2=4.577,P=0.045) in the well-controlled HbAlc group were significantly higher than those in the bad-controlled HbAlc group.(2) Their age [(61.08 ±10.04) years old vs ( 57.75 ± 9.89 ) years old,t=2.539,P=0.012],educational background ( ratio of low educational attainment8.3 % vs 17.2%,x2=6.426,P=0.041 ),medical security (own expense ratios4.6% vs 11.5%,x2=3.543,P=0.048 ),awareness of diabetes ( ratio of poor awareness of diabetes19.4% vs 41.0%,x2=17.518,P=0.000 ),two-way transfer ( ratio of not transfer treatment4.6% vs 14.8%,x2=7.662,P=0.022) and chronic complications ( ratio of chronic complication41.7 % vs 26.2%,x2=6.130,P=0.017) were significantly different between the standardized management group and not standardized management group.(3) Logistic regression analyses indicated that the age ( OR=0.954,P=0.006),monthly income per person ( OR=4.101,P=0.018 ),medical security ( OR=7.617,P=0.003 ),cognition for glycuresis ( OR=0.030,P=0.000),two-way transfer ( OR=9.079,P=0.000) and chronic complications ( OR=0.456,P=0.031 ) were the risk factors of standardized management.Conclusion We should focus on the impact factors affecting the standardized management of patients including age,monthly income per person,medical security,awareness of diabetes,ratio of not transfer treatment,positive strategies for chronic complications,improve the hierarchical chain management of type 2 diabetes,and then make the diabetic patients to early participate in standardization management of diabetes mellitus and delay the appearance of complications.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Risk factors Language: Chinese Journal: Clinical Medicine of China Year: 2012 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Risk factors Language: Chinese Journal: Clinical Medicine of China Year: 2012 Type: Article