Recurrence after anatomic versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a Meta-analysis / 中华肝胆外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare anatomic resection (AR) and non-anatomic resection (NAR)for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a factor in preventing intra-hepatic recurrence and local recurrence after the initial surgical procedure.Methods A systematic review and Meta-analysis of nonrandomized trials comparing anatomic resection with non-anatomic resection for HCC published from 1990to 2010 in PubMed and Medline,Coehrane Library,Embase,and Science Citation Index were searched.Intra-hepatic recurrence,including early and late recurrence,and local recurrence were primary outcomes.5-year survival and 5-year disease-free survival were secondary outcomes.Pooled effect was calculated by utilizing either fixed effects model or random effects model.Result Eleven nonrandomized studies including 1576 patients were identified and analyzed.810 patients were in the AR group and 766 were in the NAR group.Patients in the AR group were characterized by lower prevalence of cirrhosis,more favorable hepatic function,and larger tumor size and higher prevalence of macrovascular invasion compared with patients in the NAR group.Anatomic resection significantly reduced the risks of local recurrence (OR,0.27; 95％ CI,-0.17～0.43; P＜0.001) and achieved a better 5-year disease-free survival (OR,2.10; 95％ CI,-1.41 ～3.12; P=0.001) in HCC patients.Also,anatomic resection was marginally effective in decreasing early intra-hepatic recurrence.However,anatomic resection was not advantageous in preventing late intra-hepatic recurrence.No significant differences were found between the AR and NAR groups with respect to postoperative morbidity,mortality,and length of hospitalization.Conclusion Anatomic resection was recommended to be superior to non-anatomic resection in reducing the risks of local recurrence,early intra-hepatic recurrence and achieving a better 5-year disease-free survival in HCC patients.