Comparison of clinical effect of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer treatment by laparoscopy and traditional open repair / 中国基层医药

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the clinical effects of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer treatment by laparoscopy and traditional open repair.Methods 70 cases of patients with perforated diagnosed as gastroduodenal ulcer were selected and divided into laparoscopic group and open group by different operation type.Laparoscopy was used in laparoscopic group,while traditional open repair was used in open group.The mean time in operation,intraoperative blood loss and intraoperative and peostoperative complications were observed and recorded.Results There was no difference in operative mean time between the two groups(P ＞ 0.05),but intraoperative blood loss was less in laparoscopic group than that in open group (P ＜ 0.05),exhaust time and hospitalization time in laparoscopic group were shorter than that in open group(P ＜ 0.05),and no complication was found in laparoscopic group(0.00％),while 10 cases in open group(22.73％),the rate in the former group was lower than that in the latter group(P ＜0.05).Conclusion Using laparoscopy to repair perforated gastroduodenal ulcer had little trauma,less pain,less complication,shorter recover time and safe.It is worthy of clinical.