Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application and clinical significance of 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux disease / 中国综合临床
Clinical Medicine of China ; (12): 564-567, 2013.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-434738
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the application and clinical significance of 24-hour multichannel intraaluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Methods Fiftythree patients with GERD were enrolled in this study according to the Montreal consensus (consulting for twice reflux a week or above) from July 2011 to June 2012.Patients were divided into erosive esophagitis (EE,n =25)group and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD,n =28) group after endoscopy and MII-pH monitoring.Fifteen healthy volunteers were recruited as the normal controls.The change of pH and MII-pH parameters were compared among the three groups and the significance of the change was investigated.Results Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring showed that all the acid reflux events in the EE and the NERD groups were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05).MII-pH monitoring showed that the frequencies of total reflux,acid reflux,weakly acidic reflux and percentage of acid reflux in the GERD group were higher than in the control group (total reflux83 (54,118) vs.62 (44,111) vs.42 (20,70),P =0.003 ; acid reflux45 (25,79) vs.22 (11,45) vs.3(1,10),P =0.000 ;weakly acidic reflux36(18,47) vs.43(21,82) vs.23(11,43),P =0.001 ;percentage of acid reflux53% (37%,81%) vs.32% (13%,48%) vs.11% (1%,23%),P =0.002).The frequency and percentage of acid reflux in the EE group were higher than those in the NERD group (P =0.000)The percentage of weakly acidic reflux in the NERD group was higher than in the EE group (66% (43%,79%) vs.46% (21%,57%),P <0.01).The frequencies of liquid reflux and mixed reflux in the GERD groups were higher than those in the control group (22 (12,40) vs.18 (12,26) vs.9 (4,18) ; 54 (39,79) vs.42 (25,77) vs.29(14,48) ;P <0.01).The frequency of gas reflux in the control group was higher than in the GERD group (86(56,207) vs.31 (14,62) vs.34 (15,119),P < 0.01).The frequency and percentage of proximal reflux in the GERD group were significantly higher than in the control group (28(18,41) vs.16(12,34) vs.3 (2,9) ; 33% (22%,49%) vs.29% (22%,35%) vs.11% (6%,22%),P < 0.001).The percentage of symptom positive index in patients with acid reflux,non-acidic reflux and total reflux in the EE group were 36.0% (9/25),20.0% (5/25) and 56.0% (14/25) respectively which were higher than in the NERD group (21.4% (6/28),14.3% (4/28) and 35.7% (10/28)).Conclusion MII-pH monitoring can detect more reflux events.Acid reflux plays an important role in GERD.The detective rate of GERD will be elevated when combined with MII-pH monitoring in the diagnosis.MII-pH monitoring has a distinct advantage in diagnosing GERD.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Clinical Medicine of China Year: 2013 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Clinical Medicine of China Year: 2013 Type: Article