Effect comparison of monitored anesthesia care management technology and intravenous anesthesia in outpatient artificial abortion operation / 中国综合临床

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the analgesia effects and adverse effect of the monitored anesthesia care of remifentanil assisted by cervix nerves block and the propofol intravenous general anesthesia on abortion.Methods Eighty patients with ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ were selected and divided into the group of propofol intravenous general anesthesia (E group,n =40) and the group of the monitored anesthesia care of remifentanil assisted by cervix nerves block (R group,n =40).Heart rate (HR),respiratory rate (RR),mean arterial pressure(MAP),oxygen saturation(SpO2) were recorded before,during and after the operation.Operative time,respiratory depression time,recovery time,VAS score,hospital time and patient satisfaction of the patients in the two groups were recorded.Results The MAP,HR,RR,SpO2 of the patients in the two groups after analgesia were significantly decreased compared with that of before analgesia (P ＜ 0.05 or P ＜ 0.01).The levels of RR,SpO2 in R group after analgesia were obviously lower than that in group E (P ＜ 0.05).The cases number who occurred incidence of injection pain,physical movement in E group were higher than that in R group(injection pain11 cases vs.0 case,P =0.0004 ; Physical movement4 cases vs.0 case,P =0.0402).The wake up time and the period of staying in hospital in E group were longer than that of R group(wake up time(5.01 ±0.75)min vs.(0.00 ± 0.00) min,t =-42.248,P =0.000 ; Time from hospital(27.78 ± 4.65) min vs.(18.68±3.80) min,t =-9.584,P =0.000).The analgesic effects of VAS in E group was (0.00 ±0.0),better than that of group R ((0.45 ± 0.09),t =3.162,P =0.002).The satisfaction rate in two groups were 100％.Conclusion The method of monitored anesthesia care of remifentanil assisted by cervix nerves block is proved to be better than that of propofol intravenous general anesthesia at induced abortion regarding of precise monitored anesthesia pain management techniques,stable hemodynamics,rapid postoperative recovery,adverse reactions and shorten the time from the hospital,which was better than propofol anesthesia,and is a safe and effective method of anesthesia.