Damage control surgery after severe superior mesenteric artery injury / 中华创伤杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To determine the effect of different surgical modalities on hemodynamics,systemic major organ injury and survival rate following superior mesenteric artery (SMA) injury in an attempt to search a modality that conforms to principles of damage control surgery (DCS).Methods SMA was exposed in 30 domestic hybrid pigs,leaving the blood flow blocked using non-invasive vessel forceps.The animals were divided into control group,primary anastomosis group (anastomosis group) and temporary intravascular shunt (TIVS) group according to random number table.TIVS group was further divided into three subgroupsshunting for 6 hours group (TIVS-6 h group),9 hours group (TIVS-9 h group) and 12 hours group (TIVS-12 h group).At each time point,the angiography was performed for evaluation of shunt patency; hemodynamic parameters were detected,terminal ileum and SMA samples were harvested for pathological analysis.Results All groups suffered extreme physiological conditions including hypothermia,severe acidosis,hypotension,low cardiac output and low oxygen supply.Less requirement of resuscitation fluid,faster restoration of SMA blood flow,earlier clearance of lactate,milder intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury and higher survival rate were observed in TIVS-6 h and TIVS-9 h groups,compared with anastomosis group.Patency rate in TIVS-6 h,9 h and 12 h groups was 100％,50％ and 0％ respectively.Pathologic outcome of intestine revealed diffuse intestinal necrosis in TIVS-12 h group and reversible intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury in TIVS-6 h and 9 h groups.Conclusion For SMA injury in severe hemodynamic disarrangement and jeopardized condition,TIVS shortens intestinal ischemia time,maintains systemic hemodynamic stability,relieves intestinal injury,improves early survival rate and keeps long-term intestine patency when compared with primary vascular anastomosis.