The diagnostic value of human epididymis protein 4 and carbohydrate antigen 125 for patients with ovarian neoplasms / 国际肿瘤学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective Toevaluatethediagnosticvalueofhumanepididymisprotein4(HE4)andcar-bohydrate antigen 1 25 (CA1 25 )for distinguishing between benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms.Methods 1 1 09 patients with ovarian neoplasms were enrolled in this study,serum concentration of HE4 and CA1 25 was assayed using ELISA technique.And the markers were evaluated for significance separately and in combination. Results 1SerumlevelsofHE4andCA125weresignificantlyhigherinpost-menopausalwomenthanthosein pre-menopausal women(t=8.40,P<0.05;t=7.02,P<0.05).In addition,the more children the patients born,the higher serum levels of these two markers were(F=1 5.36,P<0.05;F=1 3.00,P<0.05).2 Serum HE4 levels were significantly higher in the ovarian cancer patients compared with those seen in patients with benign or borderline tumor(t=1 3.68,P<0.05;t=1 4.94,P<0.05).Serum CA1 25 levels were significantly higher in the ovarian cancer patients compared with those seen in patients with benign or borderline tumor(t=1 4.1 6,P<0.05;t=1 7.27,P<0.05).Morever,it also appared in the ovarian cancer patients with ascites and vascular embolism.Morever,the levels of HE4 were significantly higher in the ovarian cancer with ascites and vascular embolism than without it(t=7.08,P<0.05;t=4.41,P<0.05),the levels of CA125 were signifi-cantly higher in the ovarian cancer with ascites and vascular embolism than without it(t=9.67,P<0.05;t=4.75,P<0.05).3 During follow-up,serum HE4 and CA1 25 levels significantly decreased at 3 months after operation(t=9.86,P<0.05;t=5.12,P<0.05).4 Receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)analysis revealed that no difference was observed in AUC values for HE4,CA1 25 and risk of ovarian malignancy algo-rithm(ROMA).5 Compared to CA1 25 ,HE4 had significantly higher specificity and lower sensitivity.Howev-er,sensitivity were increased when the two markers were combined with each other.However,the sensitivity of combination with two markers was higher than single detection and ROMA,but the specificity was lower in com-bination with two markers than single detection and ROMA.If we divide the ROMA by a woman′s menopausal status,ROMA has a higher sensitivity (73.84%,84.1 9%) and lower specificity (66.06%,66.67%). Conclusions ThelevelsofCA125hasahighsensitivity,andthelevelsofHE4isahighspecificity.CA125 combined with HE4 can provide a more sensitivity and accurate predictor of ovarian cancer than either alone.