Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparative study of three maxillofacial trauma scoring systems in mandible fracture grading / 实用口腔医学杂志
Journal of Practical Stomatology ; (6): 68-72, 2015.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-462075
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To compare 3 maxillofacial trauma scoring systems in mandible fracture grading.

Methods:

Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score(MISS),Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score(MFISS),Mandible Injury Severity Score(S5)were used in the analysis of mandible fracture severity in 313 cases with mandible fractures.The results were statistically analyzed.

Results:

S5 score showed higher correlation with operation time,operation charge and hospitalization expenses than MFISS and MISS,and it could distinguish single and multiple mandible fractures effectively.It was also a significant factor affecting the cost of hospitalization.

Conclusion:

The Mandible Injury Severity Score was more suitable for the scoring of mandible fracture.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Journal of Practical Stomatology Year: 2015 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Journal of Practical Stomatology Year: 2015 Type: Article