Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physeal Defect Model of Rabbit's Tibia : Conventional Curettage vs Box Osteotome Method / 대한정형외과연구학회지
Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Research Society ; : 146-152, 2006.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-46675
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

In many previous animal studies on cell therapy to the physeal defect, the defect was made by curetting the physeal cartilage with a scalpel, a syringe needle, or a curette. Authors questioned the validity of this method because it may be accompanied by the risk of incomplete removal of physis. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Eight-week-old New Zealand White rabbits were used. In the scalpel group(n=32), a physeal defect was made on the medial half of the bilateral proximal tibiae by the conventional curettage method as previously described. In the box osteotome group (n=16), physis and adjoining eiphyseal and metphyseal bone segments were removed with a box osteotome and a motorized burr.

RESULTS:

Histological examination showed that, in the scalpel group, incomplete removal of physeal cartilage was observed in 14 of 38 (37%) tibiae sacrificed between Day 1 and 7, while all of the 20 (100%) in the box osteotome group showed complete removal of physeal cartilage.

CONCLUSION:

The results show the high risk of incomplete removal of physeal cartilage with the conventional curettage method. We believe that our method using a box osteotome and a motorized burr is better in terms of ease and validity in creating physeal defect.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Syringes / Tibia / Cartilage / Curettage / Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy / Needles Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Research Society Year: 2006 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Syringes / Tibia / Cartilage / Curettage / Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy / Needles Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Research Society Year: 2006 Type: Article