Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Different anesthesia research in pediatric foreign bodies via fiberoptic bronchoscopy / 中国小儿急救医学
Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine ; (12): 700-702, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-466901
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of two different anaesthesia methods in removing the tracheobronchial foreign bodies in children.Methods This was a retrospective study with 56 hospitalized children through fiberoptic bronchoscope foreign body removing since September 2010 to July 2013 in Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital.All of the children whose age from 8 months to 11 years were diagnosed of tracheal-bronchial foreign body.Among 56 cases,30 cases were operated with deep sedation anesthesia(deep sedation anesthesia group),and 26 cases with general anesthesia(general anesthesia group).The clinical effect of the two kinds of anesthesia were compared.Results The success rate of foreign bodies in deep sedation anesthesia group and general anesthesia group were 83.33% and 96.15% respectively (P > 0.05),there were no statistical differences in oxygen desaturation (86.67 % vs 92.31%),cyanosis(30.00% vs 26.92%),bleeding (16.67% vs 15.38%),fever (6.67% vs 3.85%),voice hoarse (40.00% vs 34.62%),vomiting (26.67 % vs 19.23 %),and other complications between two groups (P > 0.05,respectively).There were significant differences in the rate of choking cough(11.54% vs 93.33%) and resistance (0 vs 73.33%) between general anesthesia group and deep sedation anesthesia group (P < 0.05).Compared with the deep sedation anesthesia group,the average hospitalization cost[(4 718.73 ± 1 012.61) (¥) vs (4 050.25 ± 1 176.75) (¥)] was bigger,and the average setup time [(18.54 ± 3.46) min vs (6.50-± 1.70) min] was longer,but the average removal of foreign body time [(13.32 ± 6.38) min vs (39.52 ± 15.68) min] was smaller in general anesthesia group,there were significant differences between two groups(P < 0.05,respectively),while there was no statistical difference in the average hospitalization days [(5.46 ± 1.65) d vs (5.67 ± 1.65) d] between two groups (P > 0.05).Conclusion Compared with the deep sedation anesthesia,the success rate of removal foreign bodies is higher,and the removal foreign body time as well as comfort are all significantly improved through general anesthesia,but the average hospitalization cost and average preparation time of general anesthesia are bigger than those of deep sedation anesthesia.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Observational study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine Year: 2014 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Observational study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Pediatric Emergency Medicine Year: 2014 Type: Article