Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A coparative study of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy vs open Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy / 中华普通外科杂志
Chinese Journal of General Surgery ; (12): 219-222, 2015.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-468794
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy versus open Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy.Methods From October 2011 to June 2013,37 patients underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy (observation group) and 42 underwent open Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy (control group).We retrospectively compare the two groups in terms of operation time,intraoperative blood loss,length of incision,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time,incision infection rate and the incidence of biliary fistula after surgery.Results In observation group operation time was (275.43 t 12.28) min,higher than that of control group (189.12 ± 19.35) min (P =0.031),intraoperative blood loss was (83.13 ±6.34) ml,incision length (5.76 ±0.7) cm,postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal tract of (43.33 ±3.15) h,postoperative hospital stay (12.65 ± 2.19) d,were in favor of the observation group which were respectively (180.37 ±9.67) ml,(18.51 ±1.9) cm,(70.45 ±4.97) h and (22.16 ±4.61) d (t =33.17,36.73,33.17,P < 0.05).Postoperative incision infection rate in observation group was 5.4%,lower than the control group (19.07%) (chi-square =22.12,P < 0.05).Between the two groups there was no significant difference in the incidence of biliary fistula.Conclusions Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepatojejunostomy is safe,effective,and less traumatic procedure.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of General Surgery Year: 2015 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of General Surgery Year: 2015 Type: Article