Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Ⅰ-gel for airway management in patients requiring insertion of nasogastric tube before laparoscopic cholecystectomy / 中华麻醉学杂志
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology ; (12): 1101-1104, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-469881
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Ⅰ-gel for airway management in the patients requiring insertion of nasogastric tube before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods Sixty patients,aged 26-64 yr,weighing 54-90 kg,of ASA physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ (Mallampati Ⅰ-Ⅲ),scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgery,were randomly divided into Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ groups (n =20 each) using a random number table.In group Ⅰ,the nasogastric tube was inserted through the drain tube of LMA I-gel.In group Ⅱ,the nasogastric tube was inserted through the nostril before surgery.In group Ⅲ,the nasogastric tube was inserted through the nostril before surgery,and another nasogastric tube was inserted through the drain tube of LMA I-gel after induction of anesthesia.The hemodynamic parameters,SpO2,PET CO2 and peak airway pressure were monitored during surgery.The fiberoptic laryngoscopy scores were assessed and the development of nasogastric tube displacement was recorded after successful LMA placement.The LMA placement time,success rate of LMA placement at the first attempt,depth of placement,airway sealing pressure,and occurrence of air leakage of LMA and nasogastric tube drainage were recoded.The bloodstains and gastroesophageal reflux were observed after removal of LMA Ⅰ-gel.The pH values were tested at the tip of LMA and on the dorsal and ventral sides of the body of LMA by using pH test papers.The development of adverse reactions in the oropharynx was recorded within 24 h after surgery.Results The hemodynamics was stable and SpO2,peak airway pressure and PETCO2 were all within the normal range during surgery,and Ppeak was lower than airway sealing pressure in the three groups.There were no significant differences between the three groups in LMA placement time,success rate of LMA placement at the first attempt,depth of placement,airway sealing pressure,incidence of air leakage of LMA,fiberoptic laryngoscopy scores,time for removal of LMA I-gel,incidences of adverse reactions in the oropharynx,bloodstains within the body of LMA and gastroesophageal reflux,and pH values at the tip of LMA and on the dorsal and ventral sides of the body of LMA.There was no nasogastric tube displacement in Ⅱ and Ⅲ groups.There were 7 patients developing gastric juice outflow from drainage tube of the LMA I-gel and 2 patients developing gastric juice outflow from the nostril gastrictubes in group Ⅱ.Conclusion For the patients requiring insertion of nasogastric tube before laparoscopic cholecystectomy,insertion of LMA I-gel is easy,and I-gel LMA can assure good airway sealing and adequate ventilation.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology Year: 2014 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology Year: 2014 Type: Article