Clinical study of balloon dilation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones / 中华泌尿外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To access the safety and efficacy of balloon dilation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones.Methods Clinical data of 64 patients with staghorn stone according to the inclusion criteria in our institution from April 2013 to April 2014 were collected and analyzed retrospectively.According to the dilation methods,the patients were divided into balloon dilation group (dilated to 24 F by balloon dilator,31 cases) and fascial dilation group (dilated to 16 F by Amplatz fascial dilator,33 cases).There was no significant difference in sex,age,body mass index between the 2 groups.The data of duration of percutaneous access,one-attempt success rate of dilation,puncture complications (kidney calices fracture,perinephric fluid collection and postoperative delayed hemorrhage etc.),removing stones time,stone free rate,hemoglobin drop after surgery and number of patients who experienced postoperative fever ＞37.5 ℃ were recorded.Results Compare to fascial dilation group,balloon dilatation group had significant differences in terms of duration of percutaneous access [(5.6± 2.1) min versus (9.4± 1.7) min],oneattempt success rate of dilation[100％ (31/31) versus 88％ (29/33)],removing stone time[(32.4±3.4) min versus (49.5±3.7) min],stone free rate [84％ (26/31) versus 61％ (20/33)],hemoglobin drop after surgery [(16.7±3.3) g/L versus (28.4±2.6) g/L],renal intrapelvic pressure[(19±3) mmHg versus (25±6) mmHg] and rate of patients who experienced postoperative fever ＞37.5 ℃ [16％ (5/31) versus 39％(13/33)] (P＜0.05).No injury of adjacent organs,including pleura,liver,spleen,or bowel was noted in all patients.Conclusions Balloon dilation is quick and safe with less hemorrhage when building percutaneous renal channel.And it has higher stone free rate and less complication rate in percutaneous nephrolithotomy with staghorn stones.