Strategies for the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage: Minimally invasive puncture approach or key hole in the evacuation / 中国综合临床

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the efficacy, complications, safety and prognosis of the minimally invasive puncture approach and key hole in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hematoma.Methods A totol of 68 patients with hypertensive cerebral hematoma confirmed by CT from April 2012 to October 2013 in Nongken Sanya Hospital were randomly divided into key hole evacuation group(n=32) and minimally invasive puncture group (n =36).Comparisons were made between the two surgical methods in the operative time, postoperative complications, the fatality and the postoperative re-haemorrhagia rate, neurological function deficit score also been observed and evaluated in the 1 st,2nd and 4th weeks after surgery.Results The NFDS scores of the two groups both decreased in the 1st week after surgery,but compare with preoperative the difference was not statistically significant (P ＞ 0.05).In the 2nd weeks and 4th weeks after surgery, NFDS scores further decreased in both group,and there was statistically significant compare with preoperative(the key hole evacuation group (26.2±4.5) vs.(17.8 ± 3.6) vs.(44.1 ± 5.4) scores;the minimally invasive puncture group (22.1 ± ±3.7) vs.(15.4±2.8) vs.(43.9±6.2)scores;P＜0.05) ,but during the same period there was no significant difference between the two groups with NFDS scores(P＞0.05).The rebleeding rate of the minimally invasive puncture group was significantly lower than the key hole evacuation group (4.08％ vs.16.33％, x2=6.56, P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in mortality rate and long term total effect between two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion Although both key hole and minimally invasive puncture are effective measures for treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage, but minimally invasive puncture with less trauma, definite curative effect and higher security advantages in clinical.