The clinical efficacy of the different margins in nephron-sparing operation for small renal cell ;carcinoma / 中国医师进修杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of different margins in nephron-sparing operation for patients with small renal cell carcinoma. Methods From September 2008 to April 2013, a total of 64 patients with local renal cell carcinoma (T1a period) and treated with nephron-sparing operation were selected, and the clinic data were analyzed. According to cutting edge size gotten from the surgery, the patients were divided in to A group (cutting edge 1-5 mm group, 30 cases) and B group (cutting edge 6-10 mm group, 34 cases). The operation condition and recurrence rate and survival rate of two groups were compared. Results The operative time in A group was significantly shorter than that in B group(130.1 ± 24.0) min vs. (152.3 ± 28.0) min, P0.05). The 3-year recurrence rate and 3-year survival rate in two groups had no significant differences (P>0.05). Conclusions The clinical efficacy of different margins in nephron-sparing operation for small renal cell carcinoma is similar. But 1- 5 mm cutting edge size nephron-sparing operation has less complications, and the recurrence rate and survival rate does not increase. It is worthy of spread .