Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An evaluation on day surgery in inguinal herniorraphy / 中华普通外科杂志
Chinese Journal of General Surgery ; (12): 739-742, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-502040
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the safety and effectiveness of ambulatory surgery in inguinal herniorraphy.Methods The clinical data of 3 852 cases of inguinal hernia repair patients admitted from January 2009 to December 2013 in this single center was analyzed retrospectively.Cases of emergency surgery were excluded.Results All patients had long-term follow-up (12-60 months).1 575 patients underwent day-surgery,mean operation time was (43.84 ± 12.35) min,mean time of ambulation was (1.12 ± 0.91) d,mean time of recovery was (5.78 ± 1.12) d,mean hospitalization was (1.34 ± 0.48) d,mean hospitalization cost was (7 546.49 ±2 962.57) RMB.In contrast,there were 511 patients underwent a non day-surgery,mean operation time was (48.59 ± 14.52) min,mean time of ambulation was (2.43 ± 1.38) d,mean time of recovery was (7.46 ± 2.62) d,mean hospitalization was (4.8 ± 2.91) d,mean hospitalization cost was (9 165.16 ± 4 281.83) RMB.Patients with day-surgery were significantly superior to those with non day-surgery in operation time (P =0.000),mean time of ambulation (P =0.000),mean hospitalization (9 =0.000),mean hospitalization cost (P =0.000) and mean time of recovery (P =0.000).Infection and readmission in non day-surgery patients was higher than that in day-surgery (P =0.000).There was no difference in postoperation pain and hernia recurrence.Conclusions Ambulatory surgery in inguinal herniorraphy is safe with similar recurrence rate;but significantly lower cost and shorter hospitalization.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of General Surgery Year: 2016 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of General Surgery Year: 2016 Type: Article