Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Self-designed adjustable tibial weight-bearing brace for AO type 42-B tibial shaft fractures / 中华创伤骨科杂志
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma ; (12): 47-53, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-505415
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of our self-designed adjustable weight-bearing brace for AO type B tibial shaft fractures managed by interlocking intramedullary nail.Methods A total of 68 consecutive patients with AO type 42-B tibial shaft fracture who had been managed from April 2013 to March 2015 hy interlocking intramedul]ary nail were recruited into our study.They were randomized into 2 equal groups (n =34).Group A received conventional therapy after operation while group B received auxiliary mauagement with our self-designed adjustable weight-bearing brace after conventional postoperative therapy for one week.The 2 groups were compared at postoperative 1,3 and 6 months and at the final follow-up in terms of visual analogue scale (VAS),weight-bearing status of the affected limb,time for fracture union,Radiographic Union Score for Tibial Fractures (RUST) and Johner-Wruhs scale.Results Of this series,62 cases were followed up for 12 to 18 months (average,14.7 months),5 ones were lost to the follow-up and one withdrew.The mean VAS scores at 3-month and 6-month follow-ups for group B were 2.5 ± 0.8 and 0.9 ± 0.6 respectively,significantly lower than those for group A (3.0 ± 0.9 and 1.4 ± 0.8 respectively) (P < 0.05).In group A at 1-month,3-month and 6-month follow-ups,the weight-bearing status was 44.1% ± 17.5%,72.0% ±17.4% and 86.4% ±12.5% while the mean RUST scores were 5.4±1.4,8.7±1.1 and 10.3 ± 1.1,respectively.In group B at 1-month,3-month and 6-month follow-ups,the weight-bearing status was 53.8% ± 11.0%,84.1% ± 12.2% and 94.4% ± 10.6% while the mean RUST scores were 6.5 ± 0.8,9.9 ± 0.9 and 11.3 ± 0.8,respectively.There were significant differences between the 2 groups in the above indexes (all P < 0.05).Group B achieved clinical fracture union after an average of 3.3 ±0.7 months,significantly faster than group A (3.9 ± 1.0 months) (P < 0.05).According to the Johner-Wruhs scoring,group A had 19 excellent cases and 12 good ones while group B had 27 excellent ones and 4 good ones,showing a significant difference between the 2 groups (P < 0.05).Conclusions Early application of our self-designed adjustable weight-bearing brace for patients with AO type B tibial shaft fracture managed by interlocking intramedullary nail can reduce postoperative pain,accelerate callus growth,shorten bony healing time and achieve satisfactory functional recovery.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Year: 2017 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Controlled clinical trial Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Year: 2017 Type: Article