Bone filling mesh container versus balloon percutaneous kyphoplasty repairs osteoporotic vertebral compressive fracture / 中国组织工程研究
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
;
(53): 7858-7864, 2016.
Article
in Chinese
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-508705
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
It remains controversial about the clinical outcomes of bone fil ing mesh containers (BFMCs) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in pain relief, kyphosis correction, vertebral height restoration and reduction of cement leakage.OBJECTIVE:
To compare the clinical outcomes of BFMCs and PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compressive fracture.METHODS:
A total of 90 patients with osteoporotic vertebral compressive fracture were equivalently randomized into two groups, fol owed by treated with BFMCs or PKP, respectively. During a more than 3-month fol ow-up, pain relief, kyphotic angle, the vertebral height and cement leakage were observed in the two groups to assess the therapeutic effects. RESULTS ANDCONCLUSION:
Pain in al patients was relieved at 24 hours after operation. There was no significant difference in pain relief between two groups (P>0.05). PKP was more effective to restore the vertebral height (P<0.05), while BMCFs significantly reduced the leakage rate of bone cement (P<0.05). These results suggest that BFMCs and PKP have their own advantages in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compressive fracture, but both exert analgesic effects.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Type of study:
Controlled clinical trial
Language:
Chinese
Journal:
Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
Year:
2016
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS