Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Capecitabine in the Treatment of Digestive Malignant Tumor / 中国药房
China Pharmacy
;
(12)1991.
Article
in Chinese
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-524034
ABSTRACT
0.05,X 2 =0.45),and the focus stability ratio were42.5%and32.4%respectively.Compared with the FOLFOX4group,the hospitalization course in capecitabine group is significantly shorter(8.5days vs25.3days,P=0.000)and the total medical cost was significantly lower(5941.7RMB vs13304.6RMB,P=0.001).The cost structure analysis showed that the direct and indirect medical costs of the FOLFOX4group increased more significantly(P=0.001)and the incidence for adverse effects of this group was lower than that of the capecitabine group.CONCLUSION:
From the perspective of pharmacoeconomic evaluation,capecitabine is better than FOLFOX4in treating the digestive malignant tumor.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Language:
Chinese
Journal:
China Pharmacy
Year:
1991
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS