Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chinese Version of Nolen-Hoeksema Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) Used in 912 College Students:Reliability and Validity / 中国临床心理学杂志
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology ; (6)2006.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-548107
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To explore the reliability and validity of Ruminative Responses Scale in Chinese version.

Methods:

A total of 912 Chinese college students completed the RRS.

Results:

All the indexes of confirmatory analysis including ?2、RMSEA、GFI、AGFI、NNFI、CFI、IFI met the requirements of psychological assessment. The ? coefficients of the scale and subscales and test -retest reliabilities were over 0.63. There was gender difference in rumination level.

Conclusion:

RRS is appropriate for the assessment of rumination in Chinese colleges.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology Year: 2006 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology Year: 2006 Type: Article