Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The AIMS65 Score Is a Useful Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Urgent Endoscopy in Patients with High AIMS65 Scores
Clinical Endoscopy ; : 522-527, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-55037
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

AIMS:

To validate the AIMS65 score for predicting mortality of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and to evaluate the effectiveness of urgent ( or =2) were allocated to either the urgent or non-urgent endoscopic procedure group. In-hospital mortality, success of endoscopic procedure, recurrence of bleeding, admission period, and dose of transfusion were compared between groups.

RESULTS:

A total of 634 patients were analyzed. The AIMS65 score successfully predicted mortality (AUROC=0.943; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.876 to 0.99) and was superior to the Rockall score (AUROC=0.856; 95% CI, 0.743 to 0.969) in predicting mortality. The group with high AIMS65 score included 200 patients. The urgent endoscopic procedure group had reduced hospitalization periods (p<0.05)

CONCLUSIONS:

AIMS65 score may be useful in predicting mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Urgent endoscopic procedures in patients with high scores may be related to reduced hospitalization periods.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Recurrence / Retrospective Studies / Mortality / Hospital Mortality / Risk Assessment / Endoscopy / Hemorrhage / Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / Hospitalization Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clinical Endoscopy Year: 2015 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Recurrence / Retrospective Studies / Mortality / Hospital Mortality / Risk Assessment / Endoscopy / Hemorrhage / Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage / Hospitalization Type of study: Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Risk factors Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clinical Endoscopy Year: 2015 Type: Article