Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of three procedures for renal cysts: Report of 106 cases / 中国微创外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery ; (12)2005.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-587165
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate advantages and disadvantages of three procedures-percutaneous ethanol injection,small incision unroofing,and laparoscopic unroofing-in the treatment of renal cysts.Methods Clinical data of 106 cases of renal cysts from January 2001 to November 2004,treated either by percutaneous ethanol injection(Percutaneous Group),or small incision unroofing(Small Incision Group),or laparoscopic unroofing (Laparoscopic Group),were reviewed.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,hospitalization costs,and cure rate were compared among the three procedures.Results The Percutaneous Group presented the least hospitalization costs(3 261.8?779.2 yuan),the lowest cure rate(78.6%,22/28),and the highest recurrence rate(21.4%,6/28).The Small Incision Group had the shortest operation time(44.1?5.7 min),and the Laparoscopic Group had the highest hospitalization costs(9 050.9?1 116.2 yuan).There were significant differences in these parameters among the three groups(P0.05).Conclusions The three procedures,with each having its own advantages,should be selected depending on individual conditions.For patients with a simple renal cyst

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery Year: 2005 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery Year: 2005 Type: Article