Clinical Treatment Comparison Between Modified Bone Holding Forceps and Traditional Three-claw Bone Holding Forceps in Long Bone Fractures / 医疗卫生装备

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the clinical effect of tube bone fractures with a modified bone holding and the traditional three -claw bone holding. Methods 94 cases of tube bone fractures were compared based on their sequence,the odd number (group A) were treated with the modified bone holding; the even number (group B) were treated with the traditional three-claw bone holding; and then the length of incision,the time of operation,the lost blood during the operation,the reduction of those fractures,the time for those fractures to get cicatrization were compared. Results All cases were followed up over half a year,which was no significant difference between the two groups in the reduction of those fractures. The group A had significant advantages than group B in the length of incision,the time of operation,the lost blood during the operation,the time for those fractures to get cicatrization. Conclusion The modified bone holding is better than the traditional three-claw bone holding in the length of incision,the time of operation,the lost blood during the operation,the time for those fractures to get cicatrization.