Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Drug-eluting Coronary Stents, Bare Coronary Stents and Self-expanding Stents in Angioplasty of Middle Cerebral Artery Stenoses
Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery ; : 85-95, 2013.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-59667
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study is to investigate the results of treatment using stent-angioplasty for symptomatic middle cerebral arterial (MCA) stenosis and comparison of in-stent restenosis between drug-eluting stents (DES), bare metal coronary stents (BMS) and self-expanding stents (SES). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

From Jan. 2007 to June. 2012, 34 patients (mean age +/- standard deviation 62.9 +/- 13.6 years) with MCA stenosis were treated. Inclusion criteria were acute infarction or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) and angiographically proven symptom related severe stenosis. Stents used for treatment were DES (n = 8), BMS (n = 13) and SES (n = 13). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission was 2.5 +/- 3.1 and mean stenosis rate was 79.0 +/- 8.2%. Assessment of clinical and angiographic results was performed retrospectively.

RESULTS:

Among 34 patients, periprocedural complications occurred in four cases (11.8%), however, only two cases (6.0%) were symptomatic. All patients were followed clinically (mean follow-up period; 40.7 +/- 17.7 months) and 31 were followed angiographically (91.2%. 13.4 +/- 8.5 months). There was no occurrence of repeat stroke in all patients; however, mild TIAs related to restenosis occurred in three of 34 patients (8.8%). The mean NIHSS after stent-angioplasty was 1.7 +/- 2.9 and 0.8 +/- 1.1 at discharge. The modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge was 0.5 +/- 0.9 and 0.3 +/- 0.8 at the last clinical follow-up. In-stent restenosis over 50% occurred in five of 31 angiographically followed cases (16.1%), however, all of these events occurred only in patients who were treated with BMS or SES. Restenosis rate was 0.0% in the DES group and 20.8% in the other group (p = 0.562); it did not differ between BMS and SES (2/11 18.2%, 3/13 23.1%, p = 1.000).

CONCLUSION:

Stent-angioplasty appears to be effective for symptomatic MCA stenosis. As for restenosis, in our study, DES was presumed to be more effective than BMS and SES; meanwhile, the results did not differ between the BMS and SES groups.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Stents / Ischemic Attack, Transient / Follow-Up Studies / Angioplasty / Constriction, Pathologic / Middle Cerebral Artery / Stroke / Drug-Eluting Stents / Infarction Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery Year: 2013 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Main subject: Stents / Ischemic Attack, Transient / Follow-Up Studies / Angioplasty / Constriction, Pathologic / Middle Cerebral Artery / Stroke / Drug-Eluting Stents / Infarction Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery Year: 2013 Type: Article