A comparative study of conventional laparoscopic instruments resection and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy single hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy / 国际外科学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To study conventional laparoscopic instruments line single hole peritoneoscope gallbladder excision and three hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery efficacy and safety.Methods 140 cases patients with gallbladder stones in our hospital from January 2014 to June 2015 were selected as the research subjects.All patients need to be treated with cholecystectomy.All the patients according to the random number table were randomly divided into two groups,respectively for single hole group and three group.Single hole group using a single hole peritoneoscope gallbladder excision,triplex group use three hole laparoscopic gallbladder resection.The surgical effect,hospitalization costs and complications were compared between the two groups after treatment.Results Hole group operation time (87.89 ± 12.81) min,longer than the three-hole group (53.89 ± 8.91) min,but the hospital stay was (1.28 ± 0.21) d and total hospital costs (11 241.21 ± 23.91) yuan,were lower than three-hole group,P ＜ 0.05,the difference was statistical significance in the amount of bleeding in the two groups were not statistical significance,P ＞ 0.05;two groups of patients had complicatiom,but have been treated better,and two concurrent disease (1.43％ vs 2.86％) incidence was no significant difference,P ＞ 0.05.Conclusion Single hole laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduce the hospitalization time and hospitalization expenses,surgical trauma is smaller,postoperative recovery is faster,and the safety is high,it is worthy of clinical application.