After placing stents undergoing elective surgery and emergency surgery in comparative study of obstructive colorectal cancer / 中国现代普通外科进展
Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
; (4): 184-187, 2017.
Article
in Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-608552
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the clinical value of two kinds of treatment methods of selective operation and emergency surgery after implantation of stents.Methods:Methods the clinical data of 90 patients with obstructive colorectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively.Temporary placement of metal stents in 30 cases,Elective surgical treatment (stent group);60 cases of emergency operation (emergency operation group).Comparing stent group and a emergency surgical resection and self-agreement,operation time,postoperative ventilation time,complications and hospitalization mortality indicators.Results:stent group one stage resection self-agreement (96.67%) were significantly higher than those of emergency surgery group(56.67%,P< 0.001).Postoperative complications(6.67%) stent group was obviously lower emergency surgical group(26.67%,P< 0 05).Support group hospitalization mortality compared with emergency surgery group,The difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Support the operative time,postoperative ventilation time (156.13 ± 49.79) min and (3.60 ± 1.40) d,respectively,significantly lower than the emergency treatment (P< 0.05).Conclusion:Implant stents can rapidly and effectively alleviate symptoms of obstructive co orecta cancer After placing stents undergoing elective surgery compared with emergency surgery can increase the resection and self-agreement,reduce the complications and can be used as aeffect ve relieve obstructive colorectal cancer treatment.
Full text:
1
Index:
WPRIM
Language:
Zh
Journal:
Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
Year:
2017
Type:
Article