Endoscopic submucosal dissection and gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a Meta-Analysis / 中国内镜杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the difference of the effects and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and surgery for early gastric cancer. Methods We searched the Pubmed, CBM, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CQVIP and WanFang data from January 1990 to June 2016 studies comparing endoscopic resection with gastrectomy for treatment of early gastric cancer. We selected the eligible studies according the including and excluding criteria. The quality of the included studies was assess using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), then using Revman 5.3 to make the Meta analysis. Result The meta-analysis enrolled 12 studies with 4331 patients, all of the studies were retrospectively analyzed. The result of the meta-analysis showed that there were no significant difference regarding the recurrence rate [(22/2586, 0.85%) vs (6/1134, 0.53%), P = 0.370] and five-year survival rate [(852/909, 93.72%) vs (707/746, 94.77%), P = 0.340] between endoscopic resection and gastrectomy. Gastrectomy was associated with higher en bloc resection rate, which were 100.00% and 92.23% respectively. However, gastrectomy was also related to longer operative time (SMD = -3.04, 95%CI -3.64 ~ -2.45, P = 0.000) and hospital stay (SMD = -2.53, 95%CI -3.73 ~ -1.32, P = 0.000). The postoperative complication was also higher than endoscopic, which were (45/816, 5.50%) vs (101/686, 14.72%) respectively. Conclusion There were no significant difference regarding recurrence rate and five-year survival rate between endoscopic and gastrectomy. While the en bloc resection rate was lower than gastrectomy, endoscopic offers a shorter hospital stay, shorter operative time with minimal invasive and fewer operating and postoperative complications than gastrectomy. Endoscopic should be recommended as a standard treatment for early gastric cancer with indications.