Mitral valve repair and mitral valve replacement in the treatment of infective endocarditis mitral valve regurgitation in the long-term curative effect comparison / 中华胸心血管外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective The aim of the study was to compare the mid-and long-term results between mitral valve repair and mitral valve replacement in mitral regurgitation due to infective endocarditis.Methods From January 2005 to December 2014, 225 patients with mitral regurgitation due to infective endocarditis underwent surgical treatment at our institution.159 patients(70.7%) were male, and the mean age was(42±15) years(13-76 years).Among them, mitral valve repair was performed in 89 patients(repair group) and mitral valve replacement in 136 patients(replacement group).Preoperative clinical profiles, perioperative details and follow-up data were reviewed retrospectively.Results There was no operative death in both groups.Compared to replacement group, patients undergoing mitral valve repair suffered significantly less embolism events(9.0% vs.22.8%, P0.05] and aorta clamp time[(52±21) min vs.(51±23) min, P>0.05]were similar between repair group and replacement group.Intensive care stay was significantly shorter in repair group[(1.4±0.7)days vs.(1.9±1.3)days, P0.05).Conclusion Mitral valve repair was safe and feasible in mitral regurgitation due to infective endocarditis, with good mid-and long-term outcomes.Thorough excision of infective tissue and vegetation was necessary to perform mitral valve repair.Yet mitral valve replacement was a viable option in patients for whom repair was infeasible due to severe damage of valve.