A systematic evaluation of protective ventilation for surgery in the prone position / 基础医学与临床

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate protective ventilation(PV) versus conventional ventilation(CV) for surgery in the prone position.Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, WanFang Data and other Chinese databases to collect the randomized controlled trails (RCTs) on intraoperative PV in comparison with CV for surgery in the prone position.Two authors independently identified the studies, performed data extraction and assessed the risks of bias in the included studies according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.The reviewers conducted data analyses with RevMan software.Results A total of 9 RCTs involving 449 participants were included.The results showed that the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.12~0.73, P<0.01) and peak pressure (MD-3.52, 95% CI-6.93~-0.11, P<0.05) were lower in the PV group.Intraoperative PaO2/FiO2 was higher (MD 37.28, 95% CI 22.67~51.89, P<0.001) and alveolar-arterial oxygen difference was lower (MD-45.50, 95% CI-61.35~-29.65, P<0.001) in the PV group.Conclusions Low tidal volume ventilation in combination with positive end-expiratory pressure (with or without recruitment maneuver) decreases postoperative pulmonary complications,reduces peak pressure and improves oxygenation for surgery in the prone position.