Comparison of subjective refraction based on power vectors and conventional subjective refraction in different degree of astigmatism / 眼科新进展

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare subjective refraction based on power vectors and conventional subjective refraction in different degrees of astigmatism.Methods A total of 143 subjects (143 right eyes) were divided into two groups according to astigmatism degreelow astigmatism group (0-1.50 D) and high astigmatism group (1.50 -3.00 D).Subjects were then examined by both methods to fetch refraction data,and then the equivalent spherical M component,J0 component,J45 component and the duration of refraction procedures were compared and analyzed.Results There was no statistically difference in age,gender,M component,J45 component and time consuming of subjective refraction between the high and low astigmatism groups (all P ＞ 0.05),but intergroup comparison of J0 component from subjective refraction based on power vectors and conventional subjective refraction was significantly different (all P =0.00).In the low astigmatism group,the agreement of M,J0 and J45 measured by the two methods was tmified,and the mean absolute value of M,J0 and J45 difference was 0.04 D,0.02 D and 0.02 D,respectively;moreover,within the limits of consistency,the maximum absolute value of the difference was 0.37 D,0.13 D and 0.17 D,respectively,and there was no statistically difference in time consuming of the two methods (P =0.72).In the high astigmatism group,the agreement of M,J0 and J45 measured by the two methods was poor,and the mean absolute value of M,J0 and J45 difference was 0.43 D,0.21 D and 0.00 D,respectively;moreover,within the limits of consistency,the maximum absolute value of the difference was 0.75 D,0.50 D and 0.30 D,respectively,and the difference in time consuming of the two methods approached statistical significance (P =0.00),suggesting time consuming of subjective refraction based on power vectors was longer.Conclusion Subjective refraction based on power vectors has good effect on low astigmatism,and it needs to be further improved for clinical practices.