Clinical Efficacy of Cold Knife Conization and Transcervical Resection of Cervical Lesionin the Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Ⅱ, Ⅲ / 实用妇产科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of cold knife conization and transcervical resection of cervical lesion in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN) Ⅱ,Ⅲ.Methods:The clinical data of 62 patients with CIN Ⅱ,Ⅲ underwent cold knife conization(CKC group) and 114 underwent transcervical resection of cervical lesion(TCRC group)in Zhujiang Hospital Southern Medical University from Jan 1 st 2010 to Jun 1 st 2014 were collected.The patients' age,pregnant frequency,mean operative time,preoperative pathological grading,blood loss during the operation and after the operation,positive resected margin,cervical stenosis and recurrence were compared between the two groups.Results:There was no difference on the patients age,pregnant frequency and preoperative pathological grading between the two groups(P ＞ 0.05).The mean blood loss during the operation (14.16 ± 14.10 ml)and the mean hospital stays(5.73 ± 1.43 days)of CKC group were significantly different from those of TCRC group(29.80 ±20.55 ml,4.75 ±1.23 days) (P＜0.05).There was no statistical difference on the mean operation time,postoperative vaginal bleeding rate,rate of positive resected margin,cervical stenosis rate and recurrence rate between CKC group and TCRC group (33.15 ± 11.42 min vs 33.18 ±14.61 min,33.9％ vs 21.1％,3.2％ vs 5.3％,4.8％ vs 4.4％,4.8％ vs 3.5％,respectively) (P＞0.05).The concordance rate of pre-operation and post operation pathological results of CKC group and TCRC group was 74.2％ (46/62) and 72.8％ (83/114) respectively,both kappa values were ＜ 0.75.Conclusions;Both CKC and TCRCT are safe as well as effective in the treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Compared with CKC,TCRC has the advantage of short hospital stay,while much intraoperative blood loss,which calls for intraoperative attention.