Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of therapeutic effects between different blood purification therapies for treatment of patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome / 中国中西医结合急救杂志
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care ; (6): 415-418, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-617421
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical therapeutic effects of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) and continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) for treatment of patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).Methods A prospective observation was conducted, seventy patients with MODS admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine of the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College from September 2013 to December 2016 were enrolled, and they were divided into a CVVH group and a CVVHDF group according to different treatment, 35 cases in each group. In the CVVH group, the ultrafiltration fluid flow rate was set at 1800 mL/h, while in the CVVHDF group, the flow rate was set at 2000 mL/h for both substitution fluid and dialysate, and the blood flow of the two groups was 150-180 mL/min. The changes of creatinine (SCr), urea nitrogen (BUN), pH value, HCO3-, helper T cell (Th1, Th2) and Th1/Th2 ratio were compared between the two groups before and after treatment for 24, 48 and 72 hours.Results With the extension of time, SCr, BUN were reduced in both groups after treatment compared to those before treatment, 72 hoursafter treatment they reached the lowest value, and the degree of change in CVVHDF group was more significant than that in CVVH group [SCr (μmol/L) 150.62±32.09 vs. 180.41±30.52, BUN (mmol/L) 7.31±2.19 vs. 9.06±2.36. allP 0.05). With the extension of therapeutic time, Th1, Th1/Th2 in two groups were gradually elevated after treatment, and 72 hours after treatment they reached the peak values; Th2 showed a trend of gradual decrease and after 72 hours of treatment it reached the lowest value, and the changes in CVVHDF group were more significant than those in CVVH group [Th1 (×10-2) 1.51±0.12 vs. 1.21±0.11, Th2 (×10-2) 1.64±0.65 vs. 1.70±0.18, Th1/Th2 0.91±0.14 vs. 0.71±0.15, allP < 0.05].Conclusion Both CVVH and CVVHDF can effectively remove inflammatory mediators and metabolic products, adjust the balance of acid and base, regulate immune system in the body of patients with MODS, and the CVVHDF is more effective than CVVH.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care Year: 2017 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care Year: 2017 Type: Article