The choice of anterior approach for acetabular fractures: a systematic review / 中华骨科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety in the treatment of acetabular fractures via anterior approaches,including ilioinguinal,stoppa,pararectus approach.Methods Systematic literature retrieval was carried out to obtain two-arm and one-arm researches on the treatment of acetabular fractures via any one of the three approaches before May 2017,from pubmed,embase,cochrane library Databases.Data extraction and quality evaluation of studies were performed by 3 investigators independently.A meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 and Meta-Analyst beta 3.13.Results Totally 22 low to moderate quality studies,including 7 two-arm and 15 one-arm were included.There were 980 patients,including 581 in ilioinguinal approach group,264 in stoppa approach group and 135 in pararectus approach group.Meta-analysis showed the rate of anatomic reduction in stoppa approach was higher than that in ilioinguinal approach (OR=0.58,95％CI0.36-0.94,P=0.03),which in pararectus approach was higher than that in ilioinguinal approach (0R=2.95,95％CI1.22-7.10,P=0.02).Compared to the ilioinguinal approach,the operation time in the Stoppa approach was shorter (MD=48.01,95％CI17.08-78.95,P=0.002),there was no statistically significant difference between pararectus approach and ilioinguinal approach.In addition,there were no statistically significant differences among three approaches in intra-operative blood loss,postoperative functional outcomes and complications.Conclusion The available limited evidence suggests that the rate of anatomical reduction in stoppa and pararectus approach may be higher than ilioinguinal approach.Compared to the ilioinguinal approach,the operation time in the stoppa approach may be shorter.In this field,further rigorous design,baseline parallel,direct comparison controlled studies on this topic are still needed.