Comparison of laparoscopic and NOTES operation applied in diagnosis of unexplained ascites / 中国内镜杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To summarize the stomach via laparoscopic and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) Clinical application of abdominal exploration and peritoneal biopsy unexplained ascites. Methods A retrospective analysis of our hospital clinical datum of unexplained ascites patients, 20 cases were undergone single port laparoscopic operation from January 2014 to October 2015 and 11 cases were undergone NOTES from May 2015 to July 2016. Operation time, hospitalization expenses, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative abdominal pain score, fever and leukocyte on the 3rd postoperation were compared in tow groups. Results Laparoscopy group 20 cases, 11 cases diagnosed as tuberculous ascites, 8 cases malignant ascites, 1 case was still unknown;NOTES group 11 cases, 9 cases diagnosed as tuberculous ascites, 1 case malignant ascites and 1 case liver cirrhosis. In two groups, 30 cases were accurate diagnosed (96.8%), tuberculous ascites 20 cases (64.5%), malignant ascites nine cases (29.0%). Laparoscopy group compared with NOTES group, operation time was longer and hospitalization expenses was more, there were statistical signiifcant differences (P0.05). Conclusion The two methods were able to quickly and accurately diagnose ascites reason, in order to facilitate treatment and surgical trauma, less serious complications. Comparison of laparoscopy, NOTES may be more advantageous in ascites diagnosis.