Diagnostic Usefulness of the Renal Resistive Index in Acute Unilateral Ureteral Obstruction / 대한비뇨기과학회지
Korean Journal of Urology
;
: 459-462, 2002.
Article
in Korean
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-63023
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
We evaluated the diagnostic usefulness of the renal resistive index in acute unilateral ureteral obstruction. MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
Our study consisted of 26 patients, with 52 kidneys, who presented with unilateral acute ureteral obstruction documented with excretory urography, and 20 men with both kidneys normal. The contralateral nonobstructed kidneys served as control. All patients underwent Doppler ultrasonography for determination of the resistive index (RI) and the difference between RI of the corresponding and contralateral kidney (deltaRI). RI and deltaRI were considered positive for obstruction at values of 0.70 or greater and 0.04 or greater, respectively. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values of RI and deltaRI for the diagnosis of acute ureteral obstruction.RESULTS:
Kidneys with ureteral obstruction (n=26) had a mean RI of 0.73+/-0.05, contralateral normal kidneys (n=26) had a mean RI of 0.63+/-0.04, a significant difference (p<0.05). Similarly, the mean deltaRI of the patients was significantly higher than that of men with both normal kidneys (0.08+/-0.006 versus 0.02+/-0.004, respectively). The sensitivity for RI was 70%, the specificity was 82%. The corresponding values for deltaRI were 88% and 93%, respectively. The positive predictive values were 85% and 91%, respectively.CONCLUSIONS:
Renal resistive index measurements are not valuable for the definite diagnosis of acute obstructive uropathy. Nevertheless, they are helpful in situations in which invasive radiologic study is undesirable.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Ureter
/
Ureteral Obstruction
/
Urography
/
Sensitivity and Specificity
/
Ultrasonography, Doppler
/
Diagnosis
/
Kidney
Type of study:
Diagnostic study
Limits:
Humans
/
Male
Language:
Korean
Journal:
Korean Journal of Urology
Year:
2002
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS