Efficacy of ranolazine in lowering HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus (DM) are two disease entities that commonly coexist in a single patient. Ranolazine is an active piperazine derivative approved by FDA in 2006 as an anti-anginal medication. It was noted to have HbA1c lowering effects in the trials on angina. The proposed mechanism of action is the inhibition of glucagon secretion by blocking the Na v1.3 isoform of sodium channels in pancreatic alpha cells leading to glucagon- and glucose-lowering effects. HbA1c lowering to a target of 6.5% in type 2 diabetes patients has been shown to reduce risk of microvascular complications. The objective of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of Ranolazine in HbA1c lowering as an add-on therapy to existing anti-diabetic regimen. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the ClinicalTrials.gov website, Google Scholar databases and EMBASE databases were made using the search terms "Randomized controlled trial", "Ranolazine," "HbA1c," and "glycosylated hemoglobin", as well as various combinations of these, was done to identify randomized control trials. No restriction on language and time were done. The authors extracted data for characteristics, quality assessment and mean change in HbA1c after at least eight weeks of treatment with ranolazine. The program RevMan 5.3 was used to generate the statistical analysis of the data. RESULTS: Six RCTs were included to make up a total of 1,650 diabetic patients. Five studies had moderate risk of bias assessment while one had low risk of bias assessment and hence was not included in the analysis. The overall analysis showed an HbA1c reduction of 0.35% 0.68 to -0.03, p-value=0.03) however, the population was heterogenous (I2=100%). The heterogeneity was not eliminated by sensitivity analysis. DISCUSSION: The results showed a statistically significant lowering of HbA1c with ranolazine. However, the population was heterogenous. The sources of heterogeneity could be the (1) differences in the level of glycemic control among subjects as indicated by baseline HbA1c levels, (2) the current anti-diabetic regimen of the study patients, i.e. whether or not they are on insulin therapy, (3) the presence or absence of ischemic heart disease and (5) duration of ranolazine therapy, and (4) the presence or absence of chronic kidney disease. When the analysis excluded the population with combination insulin therapy and ranolazine, the effect becomes non-significant. Thus, the HbA1c lowering effect may have been from the insulin therapy rather than the ranolazine. CONCLUSION: Ranolazine as anti-diabetic therapy shows statistically significant HbA1c lowering effect. It can be a potential treatment option for patients with both DM and angina pectoris. However, well-designed, prospective trials are still recommended to determine the effect on a less heterogenous population. Likewise, more studies are needed to determine its safety.