Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of left ventricular myocardial function in patients with severe aortic stenosis underwent aortic valve replacement with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction by three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging / 中华医学超声杂志(电子版)
Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ; (12): 285-291, 2017.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-641034
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate left ventricular myocardial function altemation by three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (3D-STI) after surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF),and discuss its clinical value.Methods Forty patients with severe aortic stenosis who were hospitalized or outpatient in Nanjing First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University during the period of October 2014 to October 2016 (AS group),and forty healthy volunteers (normal control group) were enrolled in this study.Normal control group underwent conventional echocardiography and 3D-STI measurement,while the AS group underwent conventional echocardiography and 3D-STI measurement at preoperative,1 week postoperative and 3 months postoperative,then we obtained left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD),left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD),interventricular septum thickness diameter (IVSd),left ventricular posterior wall thickness diameter (LVPWd),left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF),global longitudinal strain (GLS),global circumferential strain (GCS),global radial strain (GRS),global area strain (GAS) strain and 3D-strain.The independent sample t test was used to compare the difference of conventional ultrasound parameters and 3D-STI parameters between AS preoperative patients and healthy controls,AS patients at 3 months postoperative and healthy controls.The single factor analysis of variance was used to compare the difference of conventional ultrasound parameters and 3D-STI parameters in severe patients at preoperative,1 week postoperative and 3 months postoperative.LSD-t test was used to compare in different AS groups.Results Compared with normal control group,IVSD,LVPWD and GCS of severe AS patients increased significantly (t=13.824,11.298 and-6.584,all P < 0.001),GLS,GRS and 3D-Strain decreased significantly (t=10.221,-6.237 and-5.674,all P < 0.001),LVEDD,LVESDand GAS had no significant difference.Compared with preoperative AS patients,LVEF,GLS,GAS and GCS decreased significantly (t=-2.205,-2.093,-2.034 and-3.152,all P < 0.05 or 0.01) at 1 week postoperative,LVEDD,LVESD,IVSD,LVPWD,GRS and 3D-strain had no significant difference at 1 week postoperative;GLS,GRS and 3D-strain increased significantly (t=5.446,-4.923 and-4.388,all P < 0.05 or 0.01) at 3 months postoperative,GCS,IVSD and LVPWD decreased significantly (t=-3.988,4.794 and 4.211,all P < 0.05 or 0.01) at 3 months postoperative,LVEDD,LVESD,LVEF and GAS had no significant difference at 3 months postoperative.Compared with AS patients at 1 week postoperative,LVEF,GLS,GRS,GAS and 3D-strain increased significantly (t=-2.631,7.383,-4.719,2.923 and-4.154,all P < 0.05 or 0.01) at 3 months postoperative,GCS,IVSD and LVPWD decreased significantly (t=-2.109,4.747 and 4.323,all P < 0.05 or0.01) at 3 months postoperative.But in AS patients at 3 months postoperative,IVSD,LVPWD,GLS and GCS were still higher than those of normal control group (t=9.809,7.066,4.752 and-2.553,all P < 0.001 or < 0.05),LVEDD,LVESD,LVEF,GRS,GAS and 3D-strain had no significant difference.Conclusion The alternation of left ventricular myocardial function have a certain characteristic before and after aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis patients with preserved LVEF,and 3D-STI can evaluate it more accurately.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) Year: 2017 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) Year: 2017 Type: Article