18F-FDG/99Tcm-MIBI SPECT myocardial imaging for the detection of myocardial viability in patients with acute myocardial infarction / 中华核医学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the value of 18F-FDG/99Tcm-MIBI SPECT myocardial imaging for the detection of myocardial viability and prognosis in patients with AMI. Methods 18F-FDG/99Tcm-MIBI SPECT myocardial imaging was performed in 98 consecutive patients [man 87, women 11; average age (58 ±11)y] with AMI. The myocardium was scored individually for nine segments mildly decreased uptake = 1,significantly decreased uptake = 2, and no uptake = 3. Perfusion defect but preserved 18 F-FDG uptake was defined as perfusion-metabolism mismatch, indicating jeopardized but viable myocardium. Perfusion defect and decreased 18 F-FDG uptake were defined as match, indicating myocardial necrosis. Echocardiogram was performed before and after treatment for evaluating the LVEF. All patients were followed after treatment.The rate of cardiac events was calculated and compared between patients with medication and revascularization. Paired t test, Chi-square test and log-rank test were used for statistical analysis. Results In the group with viable myocardium, 27 patients received revascularization and 10 received medication. In the group with infarcted myocardium, 26 patients received medication and 35 received revascularization. Patients underwent revascularization and with medication had no significant difference in improvement of LVEF between both groups (viable myocardium group χ2 = 0.509, P > 0. 05; infarcted myocardium group χ2 =0.035, P > 0.05). In viable myocardium group, cardiac event rate was significantly higher in patients with medication than in those who had undergone revascularization (50.0% vs 14.8%, χ2 =4.91, P<0.05).In the infarcted myocardium group, cardiac event rate was also significantly higher in patients with medication (30.7% vs5.7% ,χ2 =6.83, P<0.05). Conclusions 18F-FDG/ -MIBI SPECT myocardial imaging may well be of value but limited for the detection of myocardial viability and prediction of improvement in cardiac function as well as prognosis. However, more prospective data are needed for final evaluation.