Mini-Open Approach for Rotator Cuff Repair: Bone Tunnel Versus Suture Anchor Techniques / 대한정형외과학회잡지
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
;
: 689-693, 2002.
Article
in Korean
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-652198
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
We evaluated and compared the clinical results of mini-open approaches using bone tunnel and suture anchor techniques for rotator cuff repair. MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
We reviewed 31 cases with full thickness rotator cuff tears repaired using an arthroscopically assisted mini-open technique between February 1997 and August 1999. This study included only those patients who had a minimum follow-up of two years. Group A using bone tunnel technique was 14 cases, and group B using suture anchor technique was 17 cases. We analyzed the patients according to the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale.RESULTS:
Pain score improved from 2.9 preoperatively to 8.4 postoperatively in group A, and 2.6 to 8 in group B. Function score improved from 3.6 to 8.6 in group A, and 3.4 to 7.9 in group B. Strength score improved from 4 to 4.8 in group A, and 3.8 to 4.5 in group B. Overall, 85% of group A and 82% of group B had satisfactory results. However functional outcomes did not differ signifcantly between the two groups (p>0.05). And, any failures of suture anchor within the bone or "saw through "phenomenon in the bone tunnel were not observed.CONCLUSION:
Our results suggest that unless bone quality of the tuberosity is poor, both bone tunnel and suture anchor technique are useful for rotator cuff repair.
Full text:
Available
Index:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Shoulder
/
Sutures
/
California
/
Follow-Up Studies
/
Rotator Cuff
/
Suture Anchors
Type of study:
Observational study
/
Prognostic study
Limits:
Humans
Country/Region as subject:
North America
Language:
Korean
Journal:
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
Year:
2002
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS