Cem entless Revision of total hip arthroplasty / 대한정형외과학회잡지

ABSTRACT

Forty-six patients (fifty hips) underwent revisions of a total hip arthroplasty that had failed but was not associated with infection, Three of these patients had a third revision. The mean length of follow-up was approximately two years. Thirty patients reported that their condition was improved. On final roentgenographic examination showed, two loosening of the acetabular components and five of the femoral components in which there was one sympto matic loosening (moderate severe pain and probable roentgengraphic loosening) noted. The extralong stems are not necessary in all revision cases, cortical defects at the tip of standard stem obviously should require bypass the stress riser with a longer stem. If the stability can be achieved with host bone, Revision may be carried out with a relatively short stem. Significant postoperative complications as subsidence and progressive loosening were noted in seven out of the forty-six patients. We consider that extensive porocoated cementless stem or standard flute stem seem to be a better outcome in revision arthroplasty.