Clinical comparison of laparoscopic and open total mesorectal for stage ⅡorⅢrectal cancer / 实用医学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To observe and compare the safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery (LS)versus conventional open surgery(OS)for stage Ⅱor Ⅲ rectal cancer(RC). Methods One hundred and six patients with stage ⅡorⅢRC were divided into LS group(n=53)and OS group(n=53)according to the random double blind method. The related outcomes of two groups were compared ,including surgical duration , intraoperative blood loss , length of incision , distal margin length , proximal margin length , the number of lymph node dissection,residual cancer rate,exhaust time,first ambulation time,and postoperative hospital stay. Results Intraoperative blood loss,length of incision,postoperative hospital stay,exhaust time and the first ambu-lation time in LS group were significantly different from those in OS group (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). And there were no significant differences between the two groups in surgical duration ,the number of lymph node dissec-tion,distal margin length,proximal margin length and residual cancer rate(P > 0.05). Conclusions Laparo-scopic technology is safe and feasible in treating rectal carcinoma,with less trauma,quicker recovery,and shorter hospital stay.