Evaluation of reliability and validity of Chinese version of Diabetes, Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia (DHL) Knowledge Instrument in community diabetic patients / 中华全科医师杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Diabetes,Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia(DHL) Knowledge Instrument in community diabetic patients.Methods A face-to-face interview was conducted among 513 patients with diabetes in the community from January to March 2016 by using the Chinese version of DHL Knowledge Instrument.Forty of them were randomly sampled and reinvestigated 4 weeks later.The analyses on Cronbach's α coefficient,test-retest reliability,content validity,discriminant validity and construct validity were performed to evaluate reliability and validity of the DHL Knowledge Instrument.Results The qualified questionnaires were collected from 488 participants,including 232 males and 256 females with a mean age of (66 ± 6)years.The overall scores of the Chinese version of DHL Knowledge Instrument was 67.7 ± 18.0 and the scores of diabetes,hypertension,hyperlipidemia,medications and general issues sub-scales were 82.0 ± 22.5,65.9 ± 25.2,38.2 ± 34.3,75.5 ± 20.8 and 72.1 ± 22.9,respectively.The standardized Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.849 and the test-retest reliability of the total scale was 0.706 (P ＜ 0.01).In term of content validity,the correlation coefficient was from 0.580 to 0.827 among total scale and sub-scales (P ＜ 0.01).In term of discriminant validity,the difference between the high and the low score group on total scale and sub-scales were significant (t value =-13.486 to-35.528,all P ＜ 0.01).In term of construct validity,based on exploratory factor analysis,the scale was revised.According to confirmatory factor analysis of revised scale,four factor model containing 20 items was well fitted (X2 =159.689,df =134,P =0.064);the GFI (goodness of fit index) =0.966,AGFI (adjusted goodness of fit index) =0.952,RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) =0.020.Conclusion The Chinese version of DHL Knowledge Instrument possesses good reliability and validity and is suitable to evaluate the knowledge of community diabetic patients,and the modified version may work better than the original one.